As MoDo would say.

Jamie Gorelick, who claims to know something about the law, but has a hard time recognizing "conflict of interest" when she sees one, writes in her own defense in today's Washington Post.

PowerLine has a fine fisking of Gorelick's apologetics, but my point his is a little different. If a member of a commission is providing not analysis but testimony concerning her own actions, to the press, what business does she have sitting on the committee?