The Washington Post's lead editorial this morning provides some surprising common sense from the major media. For the duration of the Iraq Situation, the Post has been more reasonable and tempered than their brethren at the Times, one reason why the Times has become an object of scrutiny and derision. The editors stop short of actually condemning the Democrats for their behavior over the Niger issue, but they do put it in perspective: even if untrue, - and this is still far from certain - the Niger report was one part of a much larger argument for going to war.